P3D 8.0 - How's It Doing?

[markjacksonguy]

Has anyone successfully utilized P3D 8.0’s structure for increased performance?

[rdb]

What are you talking about?

[DangerOnTheRanger]

I think he means 1.8.0.

[markjacksonguy]

@DangerOnTheRanger

I think he means 1.8.0.

Yeah…that should have been obvious. I didn’t add the 1. in front because of that.

Anyway,

I assume the answer is no or at least not yet.

[DangerOnTheRanger]

@markjacksonguy

@DangerOnTheRanger

I think he means 1.8.0.

Yeah…that should have been obvious. I didn’t add the 1. in front because of that.

@The Zen of Python

Explicit is better than implicit.

[markjacksonguy]

@DangerOnTheRanger

@markjacksonguy

@DangerOnTheRanger

I think he means 1.8.0.

Yeah…that should have been obvious. I didn’t add the 1. in front because of that.

@The Zen of Python

Explicit is better than implicit.

But still no answer to the question given; the attention has somehow been given to something that is obsolete to say the least.

Just pointing something out about some P3D “goers”…

P3D has never been 2., 3. or anything else . but 1.

Sorry for the topic.

Best regards

[coppertop]

P3D has never been 2., 3. or anything else . but 1.

It’s never been 8.0 either.

[rdb]

The question is very vague. What do you mean when you’re referring to Panda 1.8’s structure? Are you referring to the new pipelined rendering support?

[DangerOnTheRanger]

@rdb

The question is very vague. What do you mean when you’re referring to Panda 1.8’s structure? Are you referring to the new pipelined rendering support?

Yeah - I’m guessing he’s referring to the new multi-threaded rendering pipeline. Still, “in the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess.”